SKU: 24639322963
osmocote orchid potting mix

osmocote orchid potting mix Molly's Bark-Based Mix for Orchids

$20.15 $22.39
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on mvanhaasteren.nl >

Pay in installments of $5.60 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 13 - Nov 18

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

osmocote orchid potting mix Molly's Bark-Based Mix for OrchidsQuick answer: what is Molly's Orchid Mix? For: Phalaenopsis, Cattleya, Oncidium, Dendrobium, Vanda, and every other epiphytic orchid. What's in it: coarse fir bark, horticultural charcoal, perlite, and sphagnum accent. No peat moss, no soil. Why it works: orchids are epiphytes. In the wild their roots grip tree bark, not dirt. The chunky bark structure mimics that native environment, drains in seconds, and lets roots breathe. Holds shape for 12 to 18

Quick answer: what is Molly's Orchid Mix?

  • For: Phalaenopsis, Cattleya, Oncidium, Dendrobium, Vanda, and every other epiphytic orchid.
  • What's in it: coarse fir bark, horticultural charcoal, perlite, and sphagnum accent. No peat moss, no soil.
  • Why it works: orchids are epiphytes. In the wild their roots grip tree bark, not dirt. The chunky bark structure mimics that native environment, drains in seconds, and lets roots breathe.
  • Holds shape for 12 to 18 months. Most bagged orchid mixes break down to fines in 6 months and start to rot roots from below.
  • Pre-rinsed so you can pot straight from the bag without leaching salts.

More orchid-specific guidance: Do orchids need soil?, Best potting mix for orchids: complete guide.

Orchids are not soil plants. In nature most cultivated orchids are epiphytes, growing on tree bark with their roots exposed to air, catching rain and humidity. Pot them in regular potting soil and the roots suffocate, rot, and the plant dies, often within a single watering cycle. The right orchid potting mix is bark-based, fast-draining, and air-rich.

Molly's Orchid Mix delivers exactly that. Coarse fir bark as the structural base, horticultural charcoal to keep the mix sweet, plus a light proportion of moisture-retaining organics so roots don't dehydrate between waterings. Built for the way orchids actually grow.

What is orchid potting mix?

Orchid potting mix (sometimes called orchid pot mixture, orchid soil, or orchid potting medium) is a chunky, soilless growing medium made primarily from bark, charcoal, and small percentages of moisture-retaining materials. Despite the name, real orchid potting mix contains no actual soil. The "soil" in those product names is a marketing convention, not a description of what's in the bag.

A proper orchid potting mix should:

  • Drain almost immediately when water is poured through it
  • Hold its chunky structure for 1 to 2 years before breaking down
  • Allow constant air contact with the roots between waterings
  • Contain no peat, no garden soil, and no compost as primary ingredients

If a product labeled "orchid soil" feels heavy and dense out of the bag, it's the wrong product. A real orchid mix feels chunky, light, and rough.

What's in the bag

  • Coarse fir bark: the foundation. Mimics the tree-trunk substrate of wild epiphytes, providing the air pockets and grip orchid roots evolved for.
  • Horticultural charcoal: absorbs salts and impurities. Critical for orchids because they're sensitive to mineral buildup from tap water.
  • Coir chips: a small percentage of moisture buffer between waterings. Without some moisture retention, you'd be watering daily.
  • Sphagnum moss (light proportion): retains humidity right at the root crown. Especially important for Phalaenopsis grown in dry indoor air.

Low organic content overall, no soil, minimal peat. The roots stay dry between waterings, then drink fast when watered.

Genera this is for

Designed for epiphytic orchids:

  • Phalaenopsis (moth orchids): by far the most common houseplant orchid. This mix is dialed in for them.
  • Cattleya, Oncidium, Dendrobium, Vanda: all bark-loving epiphytes that thrive in this mix.
  • Brassavola, Encyclia, Miltonia: same family, same care.

Not for: terrestrial orchids (some Cymbidium, Paphiopedilum lady slippers, Bletilla) which prefer a soilier substrate. For those, blend this mix with a small amount of fine bark and worm castings, or contact us for specific recommendations.

Comparing your orchid potting mix options

Option Cost / 5 qt Effort Result quality
Bagged "orchid soil" from box stores $5 to $10 Low Inconsistent. Often too fine, sometimes contains soil or peat.
DIY blend (bark + perlite + charcoal) $15 to $25 with leftover ingredients Medium. Source 3 to 4 ingredients, mix to ratio, pre-soak the bark. High if you get the ratios right. Steep first-time learning curve.
Molly's Orchid Mix (this product) ~$22 None. Open and pot. Consistent. Calibrated for Phalaenopsis, Cattleya, and Dendrobium.

The honest comparison: bagged "orchid soil" from box stores is a coin flip. Some products are good, many are repackaged peat-based potting soil that will kill an orchid. DIY makes economic sense if you grow many orchids and don't mind the upfront sourcing work. Pre-blended is the right call for everyone else, especially if you've already lost an orchid to wrong soil.

Sizing & coverage

One 5 dry quart bag of Molly's Orchid Mix fills approximately:

  • About 10 four-inch pots
  • About 6 five-inch pots
  • About 4 six-inch pots
  • About 2 to 3 eight-inch pots

Most Phalaenopsis sold at supermarkets come in 5 or 6 inch pots, so a single bag handles 2 to 4 typical repots. Choose a pot just slightly larger than the existing root mass; orchids prefer to be tight in their pots.

When to repot

Repot every 1 to 2 years, or sooner if any of these are true:

  • The bark has broken down into smaller chunks (it should still feel chunky, not mushy)
  • The mix smells sour or stagnant
  • Roots are climbing out of the pot in protest
  • The plant has just finished a flowering cycle (best time to repot)

Avoid repotting an orchid that's actively spiking or in bloom. Wait until flowering ends.

Watering with bark mix (it's different)

Bark mix dries out faster than soil and rehydrates more slowly. Use the soak-and-drain method:

  1. Take the orchid to a sink. Pour room-temperature water through the pot until it runs out the drainage holes for several seconds.
  2. Let it drain completely (5 to 10 minutes).
  3. Return to its growing spot.
  4. Repeat when the bark feels dry about an inch down, typically every 7 to 10 days for Phalaenopsis indoors.

Never let the orchid sit in a saucer of water. Drainage is non-negotiable.

FAQ

Will this work for moth orchids (Phalaenopsis)?

Yes. Phalaenopsis is the primary use case. The bark + charcoal + light moisture-retainer ratio is tuned for them.

What's the difference between orchid soil and orchid potting mix?

None in practice. Both terms describe the same product: a chunky, soilless growing medium for orchids. "Soil" is the more common search term; "mix" is the more accurate description. The key thing is the ingredients on the bag, not the marketing word.

Is this the same as orchid bark?

Bark is one ingredient. Orchid potting mix is bark blended with charcoal, coir chips, and a small amount of sphagnum. Pure bark dries out too fast for most home growers; the moisture-retaining components in this mix prevent that.

Can I use regular potting soil if I add perlite?

No. Even with extra drainage, soil compacts and holds water against the roots over time. The structure is wrong, not just the drainage rate. Use a real bark-based mix.

How is this different from sphagnum moss alone?

Sphagnum holds way more water than orchid roots want long-term. Pure sphagnum is fine for transplant or recovery, but for ongoing growth, a bark-based mix prevents root rot. This mix has a small amount of sphagnum for humidity, anchored in chunky bark for drainage.

Can I make my own orchid mix?

You can. The trade-off is sourcing the right grade of fir bark (it should be coarse, sized 1/4 to 1/2 inch), pre-soaking it (raw bark is hydrophobic), and dialing in proportions. We did the work so you don't have to.

Is the mix already fertilized?

No synthetic fertilizer. Orchids are light feeders and bark-based mixes hold no nutrient charge. Use a dilute orchid fertilizer (look for "weakly weekly" recommendations, ~1/4 strength balanced fertilizer) during active growth, less in winter dormancy.

How long does the mix last in the pot?

Most home growers can leave Molly's Orchid Mix in place for 1 to 2 years before the bark breaks down enough to need replacing. Annual repotting is the cleanest discipline; signs that it's overdue include musty odor, water sitting at the surface, and visibly broken-down bark.

Can I reuse old orchid mix from a previous repot?

No. Once bark has broken down, it loses its structure and starts retaining water like soil. Always use fresh mix when repotting. Discard the old mix or compost it.

What pot size should I use?

Smaller than feels right. Orchids prefer to be tight in their pots. The new pot should fit the root mass with about 1cm of breathing room around it. Oversized pots hold too much moisture and rot the roots.

Packaged in a heat-sealed resealable bag.

Related guides

For deeper reading: the orchid care rhythm and the complete orchid potting mix guide.

→ Orchid Care guide

→ Best Potting Mix for Orchids: complete guide

Not sure which mix your plant needs?

Take our free 60-second Soil Finder quiz → Diagnose the problem and get the exact Molly's mix and amount for your plant, plus 10% off.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 24639322963

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell osmocote orchid potting mix

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
F
Verified Purchase
Francis J. Casper
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 3
No Index or footnotes
Format: Paperback
I have been following Prof Stoermer’s videos preceding this book and pre-ordered it on that basis. I to read it but am a bit disappointed and disturbed that there is nothing by way of an index or footnotes, and no reference I can find that they are available elsewhere. My 3 therefore, has nothing to do with the substance and will update this review after I read it. But I don’t understand the absence of such material.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Kindle Customer
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Every american should be encouraged to read this text
Format: Kindle
This book had a profound impact on me. It has changed how I view all political discussions, history discussions, policy discussions, and race discussions. As a Hispanic Caucasian, I was acutely unaware of much of America's racist history. I knew the obvious examples, but this book really shows how extensive the racism is and its profound effects that are still heavily in effect today. Kendi's thesis is short and simple: racist ideas were created to justify racist policies. This is counter to the common argument that ignorance and racism spurs racist policies. Kendi lays out his main thesis at the beginning of the book and follows it up with example after example to back it up. Keeping the thesis and definition of racism simple really helps emphasize Kendi's point throughout the book. This book is also thorough; so much history is covered by this book. I spent a lot of time looking up some historical events or figures in more detail on Wikipedia to get a fuller picture. If you are unfamiliar with American history, then expect to move very slowly through the text as you look everything up for proper context. I absolutely love this book and strongly encourage everyone to read it. However, I do have a few gripes with it: - Kendi often misled me with his wording or juxtaposition of statements. I understand he is trying to make a statement, but I wish he wouldn't do this. One example that comes to mind is Roosevelt's naming of the White House. Kendi makes it seem like Roosevelt named it the White House after the public uproar over his invitation of Booker T. Washington over for dinner. However, there doesn't appear to be any evidence to support this, and there is some indication the White House was already referred to by that name well before the dinner. To Kendi's credit, he doesn't explicitly say the naming was done to appease the public, he just points out that it happened and people were still upset. Another example is his mention of black unemployment rates rising sharply in the early 1980s. This is true, but all unemployment rates rose during that time due to the recession. Yes, the black unemployment rate was worse, but he doesn't make that point: he only mentions the black unemployment rates. So as a reader you have to be careful of the facts you internalize from the book. - The organization of the book didn't really do anything for me. He tries to break down the text into 4 main sections, each focusing on a different historical figure. However, the focus on the figures didn't really contribute much, in my opinion, to his thesis. It brought some organization to his book, but not much. I would have preferred he spent more of the book going into details of some of the more significant policies or events than to keep looping the historical figure back in. - Text can read a bit haphazardly at times. There are certain sections of the book where I feel Kendi is jumping around history pretty quickly to different events and it becomes difficult for me to follow. Eventually he gets around to making a point, but it usually takes too long for me to fully grasp it at the moment. I have to often re-read these sections a second time to really get it. Again, please buy this book and read it. We would all be better off to know this history and the racist policies behind it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 4, 2018
A
Verified Purchase
A. H. Wagner
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
A very painful but highly illuminating must-read on how racism took root and persists in the US
Format: Kindle
About halfway through reading this book, I realized I was highlighting almost every single page and had to start color-coding my highlights so as to make a little more sense of why certain passages struck me—a visual testimony of how illuminating Stamped from the Beginning is. With a primary focus on racism toward African-Americans and people identified as Black, this book is a thoroughly researched, sweepingly comprehensive survey of racism from its first traceable roots in ancient Greece when Aristotle said Africans had “burnt faces” to the start of the African slave trade in 15th century Europe, to the first recorded slave ship arriving in colonial America in 1619, all the way through the Civil War, the Jim Crow laws, the 1960s Civil Rights movement, and up to the present day. In order to help readers navigate this extensive timeline, author Ibram X. Kendi divides the book into five parts, featuring one historical figure as a sort of tour guide or anchor for each part. Very few individuals or institutions mentioned in this book come off as completely free of racist thinking; even many abolitionists and civil rights activists are revealed to have held racist ideas that contradicted their cause. This made me realize the extent to which racism has ensnared the United States in its pernicious roots. In Stamped from the Beginning, Kendi presents two main ideas about racism that helped me understand its influence and progress over the centuries. First, he explains that “Hate and ignorance have not driven the history of racist ideas in America. Racist policies have driven the history of racist ideas in America.” The author admits, “I was taught the popular folktale of racism: that ignorant and hateful people had produced racist ideas, and that these racist people had instituted racist policies. But when I learned the motives behind the production of many of America’s most influentially racist ideas, it became quite obvious that this folktale, though sensible, was not based on a firm footing of historical evidence.” As Kendi explains further, “Racially discriminatory policies have usually sprung from economic, political, and cultural self-interests, self-interests that are constantly changing.” Now that I understand self-interest—not hate or ignorance—has been the driving factor behind racist policies, I can better understand why racism hasn’t died out with the Emancipation Proclamation or desegregation or any of the Civil Rights Acts passed in this country. Tragically, racism persists and continues to evolve according to the current self-interests of people and institutions in power. It’s why, after slavery was abolished, segregation and the Jim Crow laws rushed in to replace it, and long after segregation has been outlawed, African-Americans continue to be oppressed by disproportionate mass incarceration as well as disadvantaged by fewer, inferior housing and employment opportunities. Second, Kendi points out that racism is not simply a debate between those who support racist ideas and those who oppose racist ideas. Throughout history, three–not two–viewpoints on racism have persisted: “A group we can call segregationists has blamed Black people themselves for the racial disparities. A group we can call antiracists has pointed to racial discrimination. A group we can call assimilationists has tried to argue for both, saying that Black people and racial discrimination were to blame for racial disparities.” As much as I would like to believe I am firmly in the antiracist camp, reading this book made me realize I have held a lot of racist ideas from an assimilationist viewpoint that I need to correct. Kendi gives many examples of well-meaning civil rights activists, including some African-Americans, who upheld assimilationist ideas. Some persisted with these ideas their entire lives, others realized their error and later self-corrected to an antiracist viewpoint, and still others upheld both antiracist and assimilationist ideas, often not realizing the contradiction. Thus, a tragic pattern that has repeated itself throughout American history is the persistence of many assimilationists in seeking to abolish racist policies and ideas with the same flawed strategies that never work. Indeed, the African-American author admits, “Even though I am an African studies historian and have been tutored all my life in egalitarian spaces, I held racist notions of Black inferiority before researching and writing this book.” I think it’s crucially important that Kendi tells readers about his mistaken notions of race—not to make readers feel better about their own ignorance, but to demonstrate how deeply racist ideas have taken root in American culture. Hopefully this admission on the author’s part will ease readers out of their defensive mode and open their minds to the disturbing truth that racism is a lot more pervasive among us Americans than we would like to believe. If you want to understand exactly how racism took root in the United States and why it has persisted through the present day, if you are prepared for a very sobering, very painful, and often highly disturbing look at the many flaws, hypocrisies, and atrocities in the American notions of democracy, exceptionalism, and “liberty and justice for all,” then Stamped from the Beginning is a must-read. Ultimately, what the author conveys with copious examples is that “Black Americans’ history of oppression has made Black opportunities—not Black people—inferior.” An absolutely necessary emendation to the traditionally accepted canon of American history.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2017
J
Verified Purchase
James H. Lee
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Painful but excellent exploration of racist ideas in American history
Format: Kindle
Professor Kendi's fine study, which deservedly won a National Book Award, illuminates in a new way the history of racism in the US. Focusing on ideas rather than government policy, he documents the tenacity of an outlook that has stained the 400 year history of the American people. He begins with a simple, and I think unimpeachable, definition of racism: any argument or idea that attributes to an entire ethnic group intellectual or moral superiority or inferiority. Racists invariably explain these differences between ethnic groups as a product of biology, in an effort to shelter behind a scientific patina ideas that cannot survive rigorous scientific investigation. He organizes the book around five American thinkers, Cotton Mather, Thomas Jefferson, Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. Dubois, and Angela Davis. In each section, he also discusses the ideas of contemporaries of these individuals, dividing people into one of three groups: segregationists (racists who blamed blacks for their own plight); assimilationists (whites and even some blacks who attributed inequality partially to environment but still accepted the racist idea that all blacks shared some responsibility for discrimination); antiracists, who rejected the notion that any type of inferiority could be associated with all African Americans. Kendi has written an angry book, as would any author sensitive to the devastating impact of America's original sin. He shows how racist ideas, like the villain in contemporary horror movies, never suffer a final defeat. As soon as one explanation for alleged racial differences falls out of favor, a different one emerges from the (so far) undrainable swamp of prejudice to take its place. This resiliency demonstrates that racism does not stem from ignorance, but reflects the self-interest of those who benefit from the privileges conferred by supression of ethnic equality. The author's anger does not target any specific group. Few of his subjects (including himself) escape unscathed from his sharp analysis. Probably the most surprising revelation of this book is the extent to which even fierce defenders of black equality sometimes accepted some of the insidious ideas of racism and blamed African Americans for the discrimination they experienced. Thus the real target of Professor Kendi's anger is racism itself, the pervasiveness of which does not exempt even black Americans from its influence. Even this fine work of scholarship is not, in my opinion, free of flaws. In his evaluation of historical figures, he seems to judge them by their conformity to our values and standards. To judge Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass for their failure to measure up to this generation's views of racism may accurately pinpoint some of the shortcomings especially in Lincoln's attitudes. But to criticize a 19th century president, caught in the impossible pressures of a savage civil war for having mixed motives in his emancipation policy displays a willful refusal to evaluate his behavior according to the context of the times in which he lived. (Absurd comments to the effect that Lincoln was "scared to death" when Lee threatened Washington during his invasion of the north in 1862 reveal more about Kendi than they do about the president.) But even if I have correctly identified flaws in the book, this is an important and exceptionally fine work of scholarship, which anyone concerned about the future of race relations in the US should read.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2017
S
Verified Purchase
Stephanie
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Essential reading
Format: Audiobook
I wish I’d learnt this history decades ago. This book illuminates how the world has, for many of us, come to be seen through a white supremacist lens. It provides religious, political, technological, sociological context over centuries and Millenia. It explains the justifications used to treat our fellow humans as ‘less than’ - the sort of thinking that we in the ‘western’, white, colonial world have inherited, that persists through literature, philosophy and mythology, and that continues to fuel bigotry and oppression today. Eye opening. Can’t recommend more highly (book, kindle, audiobook).
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2026

recommand products

LEGO - 10348
22.62
Dwarf Elephant Ear Alocacia calicora – Plant Bar HI
24.18
Japanese Maple Bonsai Tree 25JM72 – Bella Bonsai Nursery
27.03
Japanese Red Maple Bonsai Tree
21.13
Alocasia Regal Shields
27.40